<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Hulu find itself without content?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hd-report.com/2009/12/01/could-hulu-find-itself-without-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hd-report.com/2009/12/01/could-hulu-find-itself-without-content/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:38:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joyceR</title>
		<link>http://www.hd-report.com/2009/12/01/could-hulu-find-itself-without-content/comment-page-1/#comment-2303</link>
		<dc:creator>joyceR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hd-report.com/?p=2857#comment-2303</guid>
		<description>can Hulu just go social and not worry about big studio productions? or go indy productions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can Hulu just go social and not worry about big studio productions? or go indy productions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.hd-report.com/2009/12/01/could-hulu-find-itself-without-content/comment-page-1/#comment-2300</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hd-report.com/?p=2857#comment-2300</guid>
		<description>I guess it would be OK if Fancast merged with Hulu.  That it, only if they favor the Hulu interface.  Let&#039;s face it, the Fancast interface is crowded and awkward.  For example, accessing your subscriptions/queue on Hulu is quick and easy.  Due to licensing deals, people often wait up to 8 days before their show becomes available on Hulu.  Perhaps a SMALL fee to be able to access shows earlier or watch feature length films (with limited commercials or without) wouldn&#039;t be that big of a deal.

Hopefully Comcast will play nice and can come to some type of agreement with the other providers.  If they don&#039;t it could very well come back to bite them (Fancast relies on these same content providers).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it would be OK if Fancast merged with Hulu.  That it, only if they favor the Hulu interface.  Let&#8217;s face it, the Fancast interface is crowded and awkward.  For example, accessing your subscriptions/queue on Hulu is quick and easy.  Due to licensing deals, people often wait up to 8 days before their show becomes available on Hulu.  Perhaps a SMALL fee to be able to access shows earlier or watch feature length films (with limited commercials or without) wouldn&#8217;t be that big of a deal.</p>
<p>Hopefully Comcast will play nice and can come to some type of agreement with the other providers.  If they don&#8217;t it could very well come back to bite them (Fancast relies on these same content providers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
